Team training planning uses test results alongside the coach’s knowledge of the team. Athletic Labs offers individual reports and training advice to support that process.[1] First, define the question. Then review the test result in context. The coach makes the final choice based on the team’s needs.

This guide does not set an exercise dose. Instead, it offers questions to ask before changing the plan. To learn about the wider process, read our guide to athlete testing across 25 sports.

What does the team average show?

A team average may point to a shared need. However, it does not mean that each athlete needs the same work. Therefore, check the individual results first. Then look at what the group has in common.

For example, new athletes may have joined the team. The average can then change without a training effect. So check whether the group and test conditions are comparable.

How does team training planning start?

Start by comparing the test finding with what the coach sees on the field. If both point to the same need, it may become a useful goal. However, if they do not agree, review the method and purpose first.

A test result and a match action do not always describe the same thing. Therefore, a report is not an order to change the programme. Instead, it gives the coach a question to explore.

How does advice become a clear plan?

Advice becomes a plan when the aim, group, person in charge and review step are clear. More strength work alone is not a full plan. This checklist turns the reporting and team advice features in the product guide into questions.[1]

  • What question does the test result raise?

  • Which athletes share the same need?

  • Does the coach see this need on the field?

  • Who will choose and supervise the work?

  • What will the next review compare?

Also, exercise choice, frequency and load need the coach’s informed judgement. This article cannot replace a plan made for the athlete.

How should you explain the goal?

Use everyday words with athletes and parents. For example, say that the team is tracking speed in the first few steps. This helps the athlete hear the aim rather than a list of test codes.

Also, explain that speed in the first steps differs from top speed. Each answers a different question. A short, clear goal helps the team share the same focus.

What should the next review show?

The review should ask what changed after the decision. First, check attendance, completed work and test conditions together. Then discuss the result. A good or bad label alone is not enough.

However, no clear change does not by itself mean that the plan failed. The coach reviews the evidence and chooses the next step. To discuss your club’s test and report process, contact Athletic Labs.